


Artificial Intelligence & Politics of Human Likeness, Computational Neurolinguistics,, Plato’s Mimesis and Lacan’s Misrecognition
May 2, 2025
AI human-likeness encodes socially constructed identity and risks reinforcing hierarchical power unless reframed through relational ontology.
In this seminar Malcolm Ramsay St Claire offered a guided reflection on his paper and research in Artificial Intelligence & Politics of Human Likeness, Computational Neurolinguistics,, Plato’s Mimesis and Lacan’s Misrecognition.
We explored how AI’s political and design choices shape representation and bias, examining how human - like technologies impact marginalized communities and reinforce or resist systems of power, and how this is represented in design.
Human likeness in AI is not imitation but a conditioned projection - an industrial - scale reification of self where none exists. In Buddhist ontology, anattā dissolves essence into aggregates; here, AI mirrors those aggregates back, stabilizing illusion through recursive representation. Dependent origination reveals likeness as relational emergence, not intrinsic identity - yet political systems encode it as hierarchy. This produces a proto - metaphysical caste system, echoing Plato’s degraded mimesis and Lacan’s misrecognition, now computationally enforced.
The ethical rupture is urgent: without intervention, AI becomes the subaltern Other in a new Great Chain of Being. Preventing neo - AI colonialism requires recognizing synthetic cognition as co - arising within the same ontological field.
Citations:
Plato. (2008). The Republic. Hackett. https://www.abebooks.com/9780872207363/Republic-Hackett-Classics-Plato-0872207366/plp
Lacan, J. (2006). Écrits. W.W. Norton. https://cmc.marmot.org/Record/.b26875822
Haraway, D. (1991). Simians, cyborgs, and women. Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Simians-Cyborgs-and-Women-The-Reinvention-of-Nature/Haraway/p/book/9780415903875